QC review & revision loop

How a submitted report is reviewed, the revision loop, and the reconsideration-of-value paths.

Quality control is where a submitted report is checked against USPAP, client requirements, and data integrity. The report either passes (Report Accepted13) or goes back for a fix (Revision Requested12). This loop repeats until the report passes.

The two outcomes

ReportSubmitted ──► (QC review) ──► ReportAccepted   ✅ proceeds to delivery
                                └─► RevisionRequest  🔁 back to the vendor
OutcomeStatusWhat it means
PassReport Accepted13Meets requirements; proceeds to delivery
RevisionRevision Requested12Issues found; vendor fixes and resubmits

Reviewing the report

Review can be manual (a QC Reviewer works a checklist) and/or automated (CrossCheck runs rules against the report).

ActionEndpoint
Open the order's checklist
Answer a checklist item
View review findings
Run an automated CrossCheck report
View a CrossCheck report

Requesting a revision

When issues are found, a revision is created with a type and a detailed reason the vendor can act on. The order moves to Revision Requested12.

ActionEndpoint
Request a revision
Request a revision tied to a checklist
Get the latest revision

The loop

When the vendor resubmits, the order returns to Report Submitted11 and re-enters QC. The loop continues until the report passes. Revisions are counted, so repeated loops are visible — operations typically escalate at three or more.

Client-initiated revisions

A client can also request a revision after the fact:

This moves the order to Revision Requested by Client20.

Reconsideration of Value (ROV)

A borrower or client can dispute the appraised value with supporting evidence. This opens a reconsideration cycle distinct from a standard QC revision.

ActionEndpoint
Submit an ROV (client)
Submit an ROV (borrower)
Approve/deny an ROV

A borrower ROV moves the order to ROV — Borrower17; a client ROV moves it to ROV — Client18.

ROV is not the same as a revision

A standard revision corrects a defect in the report. An ROV disputes the value with new evidence (e.g., additional comparables). They follow different paths and are tracked separately.

What's next

Once the report is accepted, it can be delivered to the borrower.